Saturday, May 02, 2026

Another Great Column On Antisemitism, By Eve Barlow 5-1-26

She is commenting on the wave of antisemitic attacks in the UK, but change the location, and it could very well be America.

Even after September 11 when Islamic terrorists killed 3,000 people (the terrorists thought everyone who worked in the WTC was Jewish), nobody wanted to call them what they were because that would be "offensive".  That's when I first heard the fake word "Islamophobia", the excuse that's used whenever a Jew is attacked or killed.

------------------------------- 

Keir Starmer, "Jew Harmer".  Name the problem, or you are the problem

"Let’s cut to the chase. The reason two Jews were stabbed in broad daylight on the streets of London this Wednesday is Islam. The country that defeated the Nazis last century has imported the Islamist incumbents of Nazism without Hitler’s help.

That is what Prime Minister Keir Starmer failed to say yesterday when he made a seven minute address. In seven minutes he did not once identify the perpetrator’s ideology that leads him to walk down the street wielding a knife and looking to hunt as many Jews as he can. The reason is radical Islam. Islam’s hadiths on Jews, Islam’s dhimmi status, Islam’s Jihadist theology. These are all parts of Islam that reformers have struggled with for centuries, despite attempts to deradicalize.

Keir Starmer: 'If you stand alongside people who say Globalize the  Intifada, you are calling for terrorism against Jews' - Jewish Telegraphic  Agency

Not every Muslim. But every Islamist. It’s important to know what this distinction means. Unfortunately when lawmakers and governments in Europe and the UK decided to mass import political Islam, they did not understand this. It seems they still don’t understand what even some moderate Muslims have the courage to identify. The UK still hasn’t proscribed the IRGC. The UK still hasn’t banned marches promoting Islamist terror groups. The UK still hasn’t cracked down on universities inviting Islamists to preach to students.

The UK should look to the Emirates to implement legislation on how to discipline itself now. Dubai has figured it out better than London.

In his attempt at performative empathy, Starmer said:

“We need stronger powers to tackle the malign threat posed by states like Iran because we know for a fact that they want to harm British Jews which is why we will fast-track the necessary legislation. And yet the truth is while we can and we will bring the full power of the state to bear on this, this is about society every bit as much as it is about security. At moments like this we often say this is not Britain, that these attacks are an afront to British values, to British tolerance, British decency, but they keep happening.”

Strange because last time I checked, Starmer didn’t want anything to do with America and Israel’s attempts to dismantle the Islamic regime in Iran. I recall him saying categorically: “This is not our war.”

“We will bring the full power of the state to bear on this.” What exactly does that mean? Starmer finally acknowledged that the chants of “globalize the intifada” are extremely “racist”. OK, so have the arrests begun? Maybe start with your colleagues, Sir Keir. I have a long list of academics, human rights lawyers, journalists, etc, who you can arrest. I have screenshots. I kept the receipts. What’s your email? He wants to have more COBRA meetings I guess about this new legislation and security that’s being promised. It’s all words. He’s a human rights lawyer himself after all. They don’t have to tell the truth. They just have to convince you they’re right. Is he right? Does the UK have “stronger powers”?

It’s just words, and these words are far too little, far too late.

Image

Yesterday, Starmer finally showed up in Golders Green like a man arriving at his own funeral. About a hundred furious Jews chanted at him: “Jew harmer! Jew harmer!” It should not be normal the regularity of attempts on Jewish lives in the UK, but it has become so because of Islam. Two men stabbed in broad daylight because they were visibly Jewish. One in his thirties, one in his seventies. A Somalian, Essa Suleiman, with a history of stabbing a policeman and a dog, fresh out of psychiatric care, lunging with a knife while the streets of north London – once a haven – turned into another grim postcard from the new normal. Growing up, Golders Green was one of the safest places to be Jewish. All the young Jews hung out at the famous kosher bakery Carmellis, open 24 hours outside of Shabbat. You never knew who you’d meet or what fun you’d have looking for a bagel at 3am. Innocent times. Absent times.

The ensuing seven-minute address from Starmer spoke often about “antisemitism”. But this isn’t just antisemitism. This is murderous Jew hate. This is Islamist terror. It is the blueprint for Islamism. If you cannot name the problem all the condemnations in the world will not defeat it. He gave the full statesman routine: “an affront to British values,” “open your eyes to Jewish pain,” vows of new powers, more funding, record protections. The script writes itself after the tenth incident. His Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, appeared on the BBC yesterday suggesting that what’s needed to combat this is better education in schools to respect Jewish civilians. Shabana, children are not the root of antisemitism. Islamists are.

This isn’t leadership. This is damage control. Where was this urgency when the chants of “globalize the intifada” echoed through London streets for months on end? Where was the steel when synagogues needed ring-fencing, when Jewish schools became fortresses, when Hatzolah ambulances were torched just weeks ago in the same bloody postcode? The Labour Party spent years platforming the very ecosystem that incubated this poison – tolerating the slogans, equivocating on the marches, whispering that maybe the Jews were a bit too loud about their safety. Now the chickens are home to roost with knives, and suddenly it’s a “national emergency.” And they’re still doing it. They’re still providing the PC caveat that British Jews are “not the Israeli government”, not the “tyrannical Netanyahu”, not the “abhorrent IDF”.

Fuck off already. For the millionth time, Israel has a right to exist and defend itself, the British media has been peddling baseless lies about the "Israeli government" for years, most of the "criticisms of Israel" they all are desperate to hold protect the demonization of Israel as the blood-sport of the elite, and Netanyahu is doing a darn sight more to quell the spread of Islamism than any single MP in the entire UK. Soon British people will understand why there are checkpoints in the West Bank, why a wall was erected after the second intifada. Maybe some already do get it.

I focus on the words Starmer didn’t say. Not once did he look the camera dead in the eye and name the beast: Islamist ideology. Not “extremism” in the abstract. Not vague “hate” floating in the ether. Essa Suleiman was imported from the same cultural and religious milieu that has produced wave after wave of this targeted savagery. In 1949, a report was published that there were no Jews left in Somaliland. I don’t wonder why.

Image

Starmer danced around the cause of all this “Jewish pain” with polite euphemisms about “antisemitism” as some ancient, rootless fog. History shows the roots are deep, but this latest blade was sharpened on imported hatreds, groomed in no-go Islamist and leftist echo chambers, and sanctified by sermons that treat Jews as eternal enemies. Starmer condemned the marches and the paraglider selfies. How brave. But he refused to connect the dots to the ideology that fuels the foot soldiers. The same ideology that the Labour party spent years downplaying, importing adherents of by the boatload, and shielding under “Islamophobia” smears whenever anyone dared notice the pattern. Somali communities, grooming gang pipelines, terror referrals piling up – it’s all there in the data his government pretends is coincidental.

Mental health? A convenient fig leaf. Plenty of unwell people don’t hunt Jews with knives in broad daylight. This wasn’t random psychosis; it was ritualistic targeting in a climate where “from the river to the sea” is not only dinner-table talk, but headlining Glastonbury and appearing on every red carpet. Spare us the performative empathy. Jewish communities have been screaming into the void for years while leftists and liberals side tut-tutted about “Islamophobia” and “context” and “root causes.” “Where are the feminists? Where are the anti racists? Where are the left?” cry the begging elitist Jews of the Guardian. They handed him the knife. Stop asking already.

Leftists caused this. Yes Islamism is the imported stink that murders Jews in broad daylight. But never forget that leftists have gilded the Islamists with protection: from the most lauded legal sets in the country to the biggest media outlets to the most elite universities. It’s all just been “criticism of Israel” for years. Leftists have murdered the souls of our Western nations in order to grow their own Instagram followings. I'm a Jewish woman, and I am a Zionist. An Islamist will kill me for the former, while a leftist will pretend the Islamist did it due to the latter.

Image

Antisemitism didn’t arrive yesterday; it grew under a blind eye turned by people who thought “punching up” at the Jews was just a progressive hobby – and who treated any critique of radical Islam as career-ending bigotry. Starmer has ignored all the alarms and is now attempting to use a fire extinguisher once the roof has fallen through. The house is already ash. Trust is gone. Platitudes don’t stop the matches being struck. Define the pattern. Name the firestarter. According to Starmer: this is “about society every bit as much as it is about security.” What is society if it is being rapidly replaced by a society that doesn’t want to assimilate. This isn’t a failure of British tolerance. It is a result of a British tolerance that was exploited by policymakers who opened the doors to ideologies that view tolerance as weakness - and Jews are the first hunted.

Yesterday the terror threat in the UK was raised to “severe”. A UK terror attack is “highly likely” following Golders Green stabbings. I'll be honest. I'm terrified about what will happen in the UK this weekend. Once the initial mandatory "shock" of Jews being stabbed in broad daylight wears off, the pendulum swing from the extremists is going to be violent and unmanageable. The thing that the government is still not identifying is the way this ideology works. It’s an ideology of domination and submission. If there is any loss of ground, it is made up for swiftly.

Understand something. Not a single thing has changed since Wednesday’s stabbings in Golders Green. Not a single ramification for a single person who has contributed to a culture of absolute fear and insecurity for British Jews.

Not a single apology made by a single institution that has created an unlivable reality for a minority community.

Not one moment of reckoning from any media institution, from any human rights organization, from any legal chambers, from any university, from any public individual who has responsibility to ensure that they promote truth. There has been not even a fragment of change in the culture that created a crisis beyond belief in the UK.

I don’t know of a British Jew this week who has found themselves receiving a single missive from a single person who now stands corrected. I don’t know that any of us feel that we suddenly have a place in public life. That the libels poured upon us for years have suddenly been retracted. The character defamation. The abuse. The disposal.

None of us have experienced anything close to the beginnings of a reckoning. And let me be clear: without a full scale reckoning, Britain as it once stood is completely over.

When I left the UK in 2014, my dear friend Tracy-Ann Oberman MBE said to me: “you got out.” I left behind my family, a dream job, friends I never saw again. I’m becoming a US citizen this year. When I walked down my high street this morning, I saw a man wearing a kippah dropping his little girl off at school. It’s a building with the playground on the roof. She said goodbye to her father, and was ushered past the door by a security guard with a gun on his hip."

Friday, May 01, 2026

Melanie Phillips on Antisemitism, 5-1-26

Here's the latest column by Melanie Phillips.  We shouldn't be surprised by the antisemitism she reports on. 

We now have a Democrat candidate, Graham Platner, who has a Nazi tattoo and who admires Hamas, who may very well become the new Senator from Maine.  That the Democrats would endorse such a person proves they have become the party of antisemitism.

---------------------------------------------------------- 

The Palestinian laundromat. Shockingly, the West has framed antisemitism and anti-Zionism as conscience itself

Melanie Phillips, May 01, 2026 

"In America and Britain, political violence and attacks on Jews are becoming normalised and even justified.

"Many have commented on the fact that Cole Tomas Allen, the 31-year-old shooter from California who allegedly set out to kill US President Donald Trump and administration officials at the White House correspondents’ dinner last Saturday evening, parroted the same demonisation of opponents and calls for violence against Trump and his supporters that incessantly emanate from the Democratic Party.

"In videoed street interviews in New York after the attack by Allen, young Americans said they definitely thought political violence was justified as “resistance” or protest because government systems were themselves violent or failing the people. One said that while he felt that Trump wasn’t bad enough to be killed, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was.

"In London this week, there was yet another attack on British Jews when two men in the heavily Jewish suburb of Golders Green were stabbed. The attacker lunged at an ultra-Orthodox man in his 30s before launching himself at an elderly man at a bus stop who had just put on his kippah. Both men were hospitalised.

"Appallingly, violent attacks on British Jews have now become a regular occurrence. In the past few weeks, synagogues and a Jewish charity have been targeted by arson attacks. Four Hatzola ambulances were firebombed in Golders Green.

"Two congregants were killed last year on Yom Kippur in a terrorist attack on a Manchester synagogue. An ISIS plot to carry out what Greater Manchester Police described as potentially the deadliest terrorist attack in British history, targeting Jewish schools, synagogues and nurseries, was foiled by an undercover operative.

"The stabbing attack in Golders Green has elicited the now-familiar mantra of shock and concern from politicians. The hypocrisy is off the charts.

"Once again, there were ritual incantations that “there’s no place for antisemitism in Britain”. On the contrary, as is all too bitterly apparent, there’s a growing place for antisemitism in Britain.

"British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he was “deeply concerned” about “the latest in a spate of utterly vile attacks on the Jewish community”.

"Yet he has refused to ban the Muslim Brotherhood. He has failed to ban Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (although the government reportedly now intends to do so). He has refused to take action against jihadi hate preachers who incite murderous hatred of Jews in the mosques. And for the past two and a half years, he has done nothing to stop the hate marches that have taken place every week with chanting for jihad, the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews.

"What did government ministers, who shed crocodile tears every time British Jews are attacked, think those chants of “Globalise the intifada” actually mean?

"Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner for London, has said Jews shouldn’t be subjected to this hate. You don’t say.

"Countless demonstrators on the marches that his officers have protected on the grounds of “free speech” have made the inverted v with their fingers, denoting the Hamas call-sign for the murder of Jews. Which part of “murder the Jews” doesn’t Rowley or Starmer understand?

"These rallies, where placards accuse Israel of “genocide” and “apartheid,” have been critical in creating an atmosphere of impunity toward antisemitic attacks.

"Rowley was, however, all too correct in criticising the muted public reaction to the antisemitism now rampant in Britain. Given its nature and scale, one might have expected widespread demands that the government and justice system take effective action to stamp it out.

"Although some individuals have expressed proper revulsion and outrage, there are no widespread demands for something to be done. Instead, there’s a widespread attempt — as there is also in North America, Australia and elsewhere — to cast Israel and Zionism as pariahs.

"This has fuelled an onslaught on diaspora Jews, who are being held collectively responsible for the perceived crimes of Israel. These claims, which are all based on malevolent lies, distortions and mind-twisting inversions of the truth, portray Israelis — and, by extension, all Jews — as evil and demonic.

"This has ripped out the social guardrails that formerly served to corral antisemitism on the fringes of society. The devastating result is that it’s now become mainstream and acceptable. Far from rushing to support diaspora Jews against this onslaught, people in the West are sickeningly — and ludicrously — accusing them of “killing babies in Gaza”.

"Many, if not most, in the West refuse to acknowledge that anti-Zionism is itself a murderous creed. Instead, they promote it.

"Starmer, like his Canadian and Australian counterparts Mark Carney and Anthony Albanese, has promoted the demonisation of Israel through spreading boilerplate lies about its behaviour.

"Unforgivably, his government falsely accused Israel of wantonly killing Gazan civilians and depriving them of food and other essentials, in direct contradiction of the facts; stopped some arms sales to Israel as punishment for its war to defend itself against genocide; and even rewarded Hamas by recognising the fictitious “state of Palestine”.

"Virulent anti-Zionism and demonisation of Israel have laundered antisemitism and Islamisation. And the laundromat has been the Palestinian cause.

"Support for the Palestinians is the motif of the progressive West, the issue that stands proxy for conscience and idealism.

"But the Palestinian cause and the fictitious Palestinian identity that underpins it are devoted to the destruction of Israel and the theft of the Jews’ own ancestral history in the land. Far from being moral, it’s an evil cause.

"The stock-in-trade of the Palestinian Arabs is to project their own crimes onto the Jews and to accuse the Jews in turn of committing atrocities of which they have, in fact, been the victims.

"Accordingly, the Palestinian Arabs have been accusing Israel for decades of committing genocide, causing a Holocaust and acting like Nazis.

"So it’s not surprising that those in the West who have adopted the Palestinian cause as the acme of righteousness are themselves using precisely these vile terms about Israel and its supporters.

"Everyone who has perpetrated these lies and supports this cause is an accessory to murderous violence against Jews. But the baleful impact of this has been even wider and deeper than merely stoking such attacks.

"Horrifyingly, anti-Zionism and antisemitism have become so deeply ingrained in the West as an unchallenged narrative presenting Israel as the fount of all evil that they’ve developed into a belief system that defines an individual’s moral identity.

"This has been made possible through the decades-long erosion of the West’s historic culture and the moral precepts on which it was constructed. That cultural attrition has replaced objective truth by feelings and emotion, with morality being reframed as “anything that offends me”.

"The values of the Western nation, which have been deemed illegitimate because of colonialism, oppression and “whiteness,” are said to be superseded by universal laws and trans-national institutions such as the United Nations, human rights law, the international courts and the big NGOs such as Amnesty International or Save the Children.

"However, because such trans-national bodies are dominated by dictatorships and fanatical Islamic regimes that hate Jews and Judaism alongside their left-wing Western acolytes, this entire humanitarian infrastructure has been fashioned into a weapon against the existence of Israel.

"For the post-religious West, though, this infrastructure is assumed to embody the ideal of the brotherhood of man. It’s therefore become a kind of priesthood administering the secular religion of human rights.

"The shocking outcome, therefore, is that the West has framed antisemitism and anti-Zionism as conscience itself. Western conscience has thus been enlisted in the service of evil.

"Small wonder that Jews and all decent people feel as if they’re now inhabiting a looking-glass world where truth and lies, right and wrong, victim and aggressor have all been reversed.

"With the Western mind already spinning crazily from the onslaught on truth and core biblical values, making it vulnerable to progressive Islamisation, the Palestine cause has delivered a definitive blow to its moral compass.

"Diaspora Jews won’t be safe — and nor will anyone else — unless the West disentangles itself from this morass and returns to the core values of the civilisation that it has so tragically tossed aside."

Thursday, April 30, 2026

It's Not 'Mental Illness'. It's Deliberate Anti-Jewish Violence - To Kill Us.

I'm so sick and tired of hearing the usual excuses. These attacks on the Jewish people are by people who want to kill us, thanks to the continual anti-Jewish/anti-Israel rhetoric and actions.  This is how the Holocaust started, with attacks on property, synagogues, and individuals.

Just as the constant anti-Trump rhetoric has resulted in assassination attempts against Donald Trump, so has the anti-Israel vitriol (and even the 10/7  massacre of Israelis) resulted in attacks and killings against Jews. Both things are always downplayed  and excused away, with more sympathy for the attackers than for the victims. Even after Bondi Beach, nothing has changed.

Wake up before it's too late.

 ----------------------------------------

Here's Brendan O'Neill at Spiked 4-30-26:

Anti-Zionism is a menace to every Jew on Earth. The stabbing in Golders Green was a violent expression of the transatlantic ideology of Israelophobia. 

and read about this frightening antisemitic attack of a Jewish man in Los Angeles:

‘Thought it was end of my life,’ says Jewish man attacked near Los Angeles synagogue
“People shouldn’t think that, ‘Oh this is not going to happen to me,’” the 32-year-old Judaic studies teacher told JNS. “It can happen to anyone walking the streets, anyone with their groceries.”

By Aaron Bandler at JNS, Apr. 29, 2026

A 32-year-old Jewish man, who was attacked on Monday evening near left Adas Torah, an Orthodox synagogue in Los Angeles, told JNS that his life flashed before his eyes.

“I don’t know if he said the words, ‘I want to kill you,’ but his facial expression and his attitude definitely gave that message,” said the victim, who spoke to JNS on the condition that he not be named. “I thought it was the end of my life.”

The victim, who said he is a Judaic studies teacher and “just a regular person,” told JNS that “I never would have thought such an incident would happen to me.”

After studying at Merkaz Hatorah Community Kollel, around the corner from the synagogue, on Monday evening, he walked home through an alleyway, as he has done for the past five years, and noticed a blue minivan following slowly beside him. He said he was wearing a kippah at the time.

He made a “Hey, how are you” facial expression toward the driver, whom he described as a black man. The driver made the same expression in response, the victim told JNS.

“All of a sudden, he just opens the door,” he said. “I don’t know what he was saying. He pounced me, immediately put his hands over my neck, shaking me back and forth, trying to choke me.”

The man used “a window breaker or window chiseler, I don’t know what you call it” as “a weapon as he was choking me against my neck,” the victim told JNS.

“He pinned me to the corner, and I don’t even know how, I just see I’m rolling on the floor, and as I’m vulnerable on the floor,” the victim said. “He gives me a stare and he says, ‘free Palestine’ and he goes back to his car.”

“I just ran back to safety, try to find a friend in the kollel, go into his car and call the cops from there,” he told JNS. He added that since the attack, it has been “definitely harder to walk alone.”

“You take your regular daily walk for granted, which you think should be fine and safe,” he said. “Now it’s a little bit hard to walk to shul.”

He added that the incident shows that “this can happen to anybody.”

“People shouldn’t think that, ‘Oh this is not going to happen to me,’” the victim told JNS. “It can happen to anyone walking the streets, anyone with their groceries, anyone. Anyone going anywhere.”

The incident has made the victim more motivated to be “100 times more effective” in teaching the next Jewish generation on “what it means to be Jewish” and “how we should always be proud to be Jewish,” he told JNS.

Ron Galperin, interim Los Angeles regional director at the American Jewish Committee, told JNS that “we are outraged by the reports of an assault Monday night near Adas Torah Synagogue in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood.”

“While facts are still emerging, the details known so far are deeply concerning,” he said. “From what we’ve learned so far, this attack was not an isolated act of violence. It reflects a troubling pattern: the normalization of antisemitic behavior in our communities. No one should be targeted or attacked because they are Jewish. Period.”

The attack occurred in the district of Katy Yaroslavsky, a member of the Los Angeles City Council and a Democrat, who is Jewish.

“Last night, an individual assaulted a man leaving Adas Torah Synagogue in Pico-Robertson. According to preliminary information, the suspect approached the victim, attacked him and fled the scene while shouting antisemitic remarks,” she told JNS. “The victim received medical attention and is recovering. LAPD has informed our office that this is being investigated as a hate crime.”

“Hate incidents and hate crimes in Los Angeles have increased significantly over the past several years. When hate speech targeting Jewish communities increases and becomes normalized, violence against our community follows,” Yaroslavsky told JNS. “This pattern has existed for thousands of years, and we need to call it out directly for what it is. Antisemitism has no place in Los Angeles, and I call on my colleagues and fellow community leaders to condemn this violence, protect the freedom to worship and stand with Jewish Angelenos.”

This Nasal Spray Helps With COVID Symptoms

This is good to know!  I looked it up and discovered that the nasal spray azelastine is sold at CVS as Astepro for under $25.00.

---------------------------------------------------------------- 

Prevention Magazine, 4-29-26 

Scientists Say This Surprising OTC Medication Lowers Your Risk of COVID. It may shorten how long you’re sick, too. 

  • The over-the-counter nasal spray azelastine may reduce your risk of COVID-19, according to one study.
  • Azelastine may also shorten how long you’re sick and reduce your risk of other viruses like the common cold.
  • Doctors explain how it works, plus whether you should try it during COVID season.

While staying up to date with your vaccines, regular hand-washing, and avoiding crowds or wearing a mask in crowded settings can all help protect you from viruses like COVID-19, scientists continue to look for other strategies and treatments that can help keep you healthy. One study, for instance, found a surprising link between the nasal spray azelastine and COVID risk. Read on to discover what the researchers found, plus how to apply their findings to your healthy routine.

According to a phase 2 clinical trial published in JAMA, using azelastine (an antihistamine nasal spray used to treat allergy symptoms and sold under the brand name Astepro Allergy) may help fend off COVID-19 and the common cold. For the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, researchers recruited 450 healthy volunteers in Germany. Of those, more than 99% had received the COVID-19 vaccine at least once.

The participants were split into two groups: One used an azelastine nasal spray in each nostril at least three times a day for about 56 days. The other used a placebo spray. Everyone was tested for COVID-19 twice a week.

The researchers discovered that people in the azelastine group were about three times less likely to contract COVID-19 compared to those in the placebo group. Ultimately, just five people in the azelastine group (or 2.2%) tested positive for the virus, while 15 (6.7%) tested positive in the placebo group. People in the azelastine group also had a positive test for less time than their placebo-using counterparts (3.4 days compared to 5.14 days).

It doesn’t stop there: People in the azelastine group were also less likely to get any type of virus, including the common cold. The researchers discovered that only 8.4% of people in the azelastine group contracted a virus compared to 18.8% in the placebo group. The azelastine users reported only being sick for 1.73 days compared to 2.75 days in the placebo group.

Those are some pretty impressive findings, and it’s not the only data to suggest that azelastine may help lower your risk of getting sick. While doctors say azelastine may be a promising option to lower your risk of COVID, they want you to keep a few things in mind before running to your local pharmacy to stock up.

How does azelastine help prevent COVID and the common cold?

This study simply found a connection between using azelastine and a lowered risk of getting COVID-19 and other viruses—it didn’t determine an exact reason for this. But doctors say there could be a few things behind this.

For allergies, azelastine works by blocking histamine, a substance in the body that causes allergy symptoms, explained Jamie Alan, Pharm.D., Ph.D., an associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology at Michigan State University. “This is an antihistamine similar to Claritin or Zyrtec,” she said. “Azelastine is found typically in nasal sprays and eye drops.”

Azelastine also interferes with the function of proteins in viruses, making them less likely to be able to infect you, said Amesh A. Adalja, M.D., an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

It seems to be able to inhibit the H2 receptor—a type of histamine receptor—which may impact how well a virus is able to get into your cells, explained Thomas Russo, M.D., a professor and chief of infectious diseases at the University at Buffalo in New York. “It appears to block viral attachments and maybe even moderate the immune response,” he said.

Inflammation may be a factor, too, Alan said. “I hypothesize that by using a nasal antihistamine, it would reduce the local response in the upper respiratory system, and therefore would reduce the local inflammation,” she said. “By reducing the local inflammation, it would be theoretically harder for a virus to attach and infect the upper respiratory system.”

Azelastine was first explored as a potential treatment for COVID-19 earlier on in the pandemic. There is some research to suggest azelastine may bind to a receptor that SARS-CoV-2 uses to access your cells, and it also may reduce viral load in your nasal passages. There’s other datato suggest that azelastine may also work against other viruses, including RSV and the flu.

Potential side effects of azelastine

While azelastine is considered a safe medication and is designed for long-term use, it comes with a risk of potential side effects. According to the National Library of Medicine, those may include:

  • Bitter taste
  • Nasal burning, pain, or discomfort
  • Sneezing, runny nose
  • Headache
  • Sore throat
  • Dry mouth
  • Nosebleeds
  • Dizziness
  • Nausea
  • Tiredness

Participants in both groups had side effects, but they were more common in the azelastine group. Those included bitter taste, nosebleeds (not many, but in 6.6% of the azelastine group compared to 4% of the placebo group), and fatigue.

Should you use azelastine to help lower your risk of COVID?

Doctors agree that azelastine may be helpful in lowering your risk of COVID—but more research is needed. “This is a phase 2 clinical trial, so the intervention will need more study before it can be confirmed as an effective prophylactic,” Dr. Adalja said.

But azelastine “does seem to have some antiviral properties,” said William Schaffner, M.D., an infectious disease specialist and professor at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine. “Who knows? You might reduce your risk of RSV and influenza as well,” he said. “There seems to be no risk to using the medications.”

Alan agreed, noting that there’s likely no harm to using azelastine as long as you’re not allergic to any of the ingredients in the nasal spray.

But Dr. Russo pointed out that it’s tricky to use a nasal spray several times a day. “The data suggest that if you use this three to five times a day, it may be similar to decreasing the likelihood of contracting COVID as getting the vaccine,” he said. “But it’s really hard to take a medication once a day, let alone five times a day.” For many people, it’s ultimately easier—and cheaper—to just get the vaccine, he said.

Dr. Schaffner agreed. “Getting people to be compliant with this over the entire COVID season is substantial,” he said.

That said, Dr. Russo noted that there may be some benefit in using azelastine before a big event. “You may think, ‘I’m going to a wedding and it’s going to be a high-risk situation.’ So, you might start taking this a few days beforehand and a few days afterward as extra protection,” he said.

As there’s no data comparing azelastine to more traditional methods of preventing COVID-19, like getting the vaccine and wearing masks, doctors recommend doing those first. “This should not be a substitute for vaccination,” Dr. Schaffner said.

Dr. Adalja agreed. “In the best-case scenario, it will likely have a complementary role to vaccines—especially if shown to block infection, which vaccines against COVID are not able to do durably—and possibly provide protection against viruses for which there are no vaccines,” he said. But ultimately, doctors say that more research is needed first.

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Advice From A Security Expert On How To Protect Our President

Patrick J. Brosnan is a former NYPD detective and founder of Brosnan Risk Consultants, the nation’s largest privately held security company. This article is from the 4-27-26 New York Post:

---------------------------------------------- 

How Trump's protectors are failing him over and over again -- and will get him killed unless we act now

Patrick J. Brosnan 

In my four decades protecting lives — from the streets of the South Bronx as an NYPD detective in the robbery and gun squads to building and leading a powerhouse security company — I have never seen a more alarming pattern of incompetence.

In the past 22 months, four documented assassination attempts have been made against President Trump.  

My experience growing Brosnan Risk Consultants from a one-man basement operation into a firm deploying over 7,000 elite security professionals across 43 states has sharpened my ability to spot the micro-gaps, systemic breakdowns and unforgivable lapses that others overlook.

And I’ve been physically present at every one of those four would-be assassination locations.

I’ve walked the rooftops, scoured the perimeters and tested the protocols myself.

What I’ve found is not just failure, but an alarming level of negligence that will get the president killed unless we act now.

On July 13, 2024, in Butler, Pa., Thomas Matthew Crooks exploited catastrophic failures in communication, coordination, command and control.

Local, state and federal agencies collapsed at the most basic level.

The shooter was the only person who thought to put a drone in the air that day: Incredibly, none of the multiple agencies on scene did.

With readily available counter-drone technology, integrated with ironclad security protocols and real-time command, Crooks would have been identified and neutralized long before he climbed atop Building 6 and fired.

Two months later, on Sept. 15, 2024, Ryan Wesley Routh hid in the bushes at Trump International Golf Course with an automatic weapon for nearly 12 hours.

Twelve hours — when a simple canine patrol would’ve identified him in minutes.

The complete absence of proactive, layered detection assets at that golf course was inexcusable, and nearly fatal.

On Feb. 22 of this year, Austin Tucker Martin tried to breach the North Gate at Mar-a-Lago armed with a shotgun and a gas can.

I have personally ridden my motorcycle through that exact gate more than 100 times, so I saw it in action: It was a legacy, heavy gate with a slow cycle that took up to 60 seconds to close.

Any competent security plan would have ensured that gate would snap shut almost instantly, like a mousetrap, when a threat was spotted, eliminating the window for penetration.

The danger was identified after the February breach and was quickly corrected, now replaced by an updated gate that closes lightning fast.

This is what intelligent security planning requires — constant reassessment — because the Winter White House cannot be protected with half-measures.

Then came Saturday’s attempt at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, when Cole Tomas Allen allegedly sprinted through the magnetometer with multiple weapons and shot a Secret Service officer en route to the International Ballroom as the event got underway.

Plainclothes and uniformed officers positioned strategically in the Hilton Hotel’s lobby would have dropped him cold before he ever reached the checkpoint.

Moreover, magnetometers should have been mandatory at the hotel’s Connecticut Avenue entrance for the duration of the event.

This 1,107-room Hilton — potentially packed with 2,000 or more guests and 2,500 attendees — required full choke-and-funnel screening: metal detectors, bag searches and ID checks for everyone, hotel guests included.  

Even then, a second magnetometer checkpoint was essential outside the ballroom, with armed officers at the escalator base, staircases and throughout the lobby.

Yet such basic layered security measures were ignored.

These attempts on Trump’s life were not random acts of God.

And the near misses were the predictable result of outdated thinking, weak technology, fragmented command and personnel who lack the elite training and battlefield mindset required for this threat level.

After a lifetime spent building systems that close every micro-gap, I know what works: seamless integration of the best and brightest — former Delta Force, Navy SEALs, Army Rangers, top law enforcement — paired with world-class canines, counter-drone capability, rapid-response protocols and zero tolerance for slow gates or blind spots.

We are running out of time.

We must immediately get smarter — demanding truly comprehensive, ironclad security built by top professionals — or we’ll see attempts like these again and again.

Sooner or later, one will succeed, and someone will kill the president of the United States.

The American people deserve better. Trump does, too.

No previous president has had so many confirmed attempts on his life.

What worked for Jimmy Carter clearly doesn’t work for Donald Trump.

Different world, different rules: The US Secret Service’s entire playbook — from protocol and policy to procedures and staffing — must undergo a total overhaul.

We need the highest level of protection this nation can provide before the next attempt on Trump becomes the final one.

Your Local Epidemiologist 4-29-26

This newsletter was written by Kristen Panthagani, MD PhD, who is completing a combined emergency medicine residency and research fellowship focusing on health literacy and communication. In her free time, she writes the newsletters You Can Know Things and The Public Health Roundup.

-------------------------------- 

5 (more) logical fallacies in the era of RFK Jr.; Common rhetorical tricks that are used to spread false health information

Kristen Panthagani, MD, PhD, Apr 29, 2026 

Last month I wrote about 5 logical fallacies that are trending right now in the world of health, and there was a resounding request for round two. So here you have it!

But first: why should you care? Learning to identify logical fallacies is a form of prebunking. There are SO MANY false health claims on the internet, and chasing them down one by one is not possible. Instead, if you can learn to recognize these common errors in reasoning and manipulative patterns, you can be prepared to discern unreliable information when you encounter it in the wild.

And research has shown prebunking works: teaching people logical fallacies helps them discern what information is reliable, and what is not.

Alright, now to the fallacies.

Anecdotal fallacy

The anecdotal fallacy occurs when people use their limited personal experience to make sweeping conclusions. Our personal experiences are important, and they guide many of our decisions. But they also often give us incomplete information because they only reflect one experience or point of view. The error in reasoning occurs when a person assumes their limited experience provides complete information and is enough to make much broader conclusions.

Examples of this fallacy in action:

  • My child didn’t get vaccinated and they’re fine! (anecdote) Vaccines aren’t really needed. (broader conclusion)

  • I stopped eating bread and felt better (anecdote)—gluten is causing so much inflammation in the modern diet. (broader conclusion)

  • I started taking this new supplement and have so much energy (anecdote)—it really works! (broader conclusion)

Appeal to emotion fallacy

The appeal to emotion fallacy tries to win an argument not by providing evidence, but by distracting people with strong, emotionally charged language or imagery to evoke feelings such as fear, anger, or sadness.

The image below is a great example. It was used to try to convince Americans that children in the U.S. receive too many vaccines. Instead of providing accurate data, the image triggers an emotional reaction by using images of lots of needles, which feels scary, and by showing the U.S. baby as unhappy (frowning).

This emotionally charged imagery distracts people from the fact that the message is inaccurate. U.S. babies do not receive 72 injections, and the image creates a distorted view of immunization by emphasizing fear of needles while ignoring the benefits.

Emotion, by itself, isn’t inherently wrong or invalid, and it can be used appropriately in health messaging. The error in reasoning occurs when emotion is used in place of a reasoned argument, or when it is used to distract from the fact that insufficient or inaccurate evidence has been provided (as was the case here).

Appeal to authority

The appeal to authority fallacy says that authority figures (experts) are always right. But this is not always true; reality does not bend to the will or whims of experts. Right now I think this one is especially confusing, because the scientific community says “trust the experts!” but then when an expert says something a bit weird, they say “ignore them!”

In science, what ultimately matters is the quality of the data and analysis—not who is making the claim. Experts are often more reliable because they’re trained to evaluate evidence, which is why it usually makes sense to trust them.

But their credentials alone aren’t proof—people with MDs and PhDs have to provide data to back up what they’re saying. The error in reasoning comes from assuming that a person’s title or credentials alone are enough to say they are correct, without requiring they provide additional evidence to support their argument.

Examples of this fallacy in action:

  • “Dr. Malone is the inventor of mRNA vaccines; he knows what he’s talking about!”

  • “I’ve seen five doctors online recommend this supplement—it must work.”

  • “A Harvard study showed Tylenol during pregnancy is linked to autism, it must be true!”

The appeal to authority fallacy in action.

Moving the goal posts fallacy

The moving the goalposts fallacy occurs when someone refuses to accept valid evidence supporting an argument and instead changes their demands. This tactic makes it so an argument is never settled because the demands are constantly changing.

One of the most famous examples of this fallacy is the rumor around vaccines and autism. Back in the 1990s, the original argument was the MMR vaccine may be linked to autism. This was studied extensively, and no link was found. But instead of saying “oh that’s great!” the goalposts changed and the rumor lived on: next it was alleged it was actually thimerosal (a vaccine ingredient) that was causing autism. When studies found no link between thimerosal and autism, the demands shifted again. This has happened over and over again for the last three decades, turning what was once a valid hypothesis into an unfalsifiable rumor that is designed to never die. When moving the goal posts is used, no amount of data is ever deemed “enough.”

See this video on YouTube, Instagram, or Facebook.

Straw man fallacy

The straw man fallacy occurs when someone misrepresents an argument to make it easier to attack. Instead of engaging with what was actually said, they oversimplify or exaggerate it, making it sound more extreme or simplistic than it really is. This fake version (“the strawman”) is easier to knock down, creating the illusion of winning the argument. But in reality, the original point was never addressed.

Examples of this fallacy in action:

“You said vaccines are safe, but clearly they have side effects!

  • Real claim: “Safe” means the benefits of vaccines outweigh the risks, and serious side effects are very rare.

  • Straw man version: “Safe” means no risks of any side effects whatsoever.

“Doctors just want you to take a pill for everything.”

  • Real claim: Chronic health conditions are complex, and sometimes diet and exercise alone are the best approach, while other times medications may be needed.

  • Straw man version: Doctors just want to push pills for conditions that are really caused by poor diet and lack of exercise.

Communication tips for talking about fallacies

Prebunking by teaching these logical fallacies can be an effective strategy for helping people recognize unreliable health information. Here are a few communication tips to keep in mind when sharing these with your communities.

  1. The goal is not to make people feel stupid. EVERYONE uses and falls for these fallacies from time to time, and they are not a sign of lack of intelligence. The goal is to empower people to identify and resist manipulation tactics, not to make them feel stupid. In general, shame-based messaging does not work, and it won’t work here.

  2. Don’t just name the fallacy, explain the reasoning error. Naming the fallacy alone likely won’t help—the goal is to help people understand for themselves why the reasoning doesn’t hold up, so they can be equipped to identify the flaw in the future.

  3. Provide real-world examples when possible. Hypothetical examples can be useful, but real-world examples help people see and understand these manipulation tactics in the wild, setting them up to identify them in the future.

Stay tuned for part three of this series, where we’ll dive into other rhetorical tricks that are commonly used to spread false health information. Subscribe below to follow along!


A version of this post was originally published on You Can Know Things.

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Your Local Epidemiologist - The Dose, 4-28-26

Here's Katelyn Jetelina with the latest fact-filled issue of The Dose. 

-------------------------------------------------------

Triple the ticks, military ends flu vaccine, Vitamin K refusal and rotavirus surging, alpha-gal trends, and good news

The Dose (April 28) - Katelyn Jetelina

The weather is changing, and so is public trust in medical evidence—and both are showing up in the data.

Tick season is off to a bad start, a decrease in trust is pulling several diseases down with it, and the Pentagon just ended its flu immunization requirement. But there’s a lot of good news this week, too. Plus, we answer your questions on alpha-gal syndrome, a tick-triggered meat allergy.

Here’s what’s circulating and what it means for you.


Disease weather report

Ticks are unusually high

Well, it wasn’t a blip. Tick season really is off to an unusually bad start. Emergency department visits for tick bites are running at roughly 114 per 100,000 people per week, nearly triple the typical rate at this time of year (44 per 100,000). The Northeast is bearing the brunt of it, with the Midwest running a close second.

Data from CDC; Annotated by Your Local Epidemiologist.

What this means for you: The main concern is Lyme disease (carried by black-legged ticks), but lone star ticks and dog ticks are also active and can transmit other illnesses, such as alpha-gal syndrome (see more below). There are many things you can do to prevent tick bites, and remember: nymphs are the size of a poppy seed.

Respiratory viruses are back to typical patterns

If you’re sick right now, it’s almost certainly a common cold. Rhinoviruses and enteroviruses dominate this time of year, and everything else—flu, RSV (which had a notably late season), and Covid—is finally declining for the first time in a long time!

Percent of positive tests for respiratory viruses. Source: NREVSS; Annotated by Your Local Epidemiologist

What this means for you: Rest and fluids. (Yes, this really helps your immune system.)

Other diseases are increasing: Rotavirus and Vitamin K

Rotavirus (a contagious gut virus and the leading cause of severe diarrhea in young children) is generating headlines, with levels higher than last year. Wastewater monitoring shows a striking signal, though this monitoring technique is relatively new for rotavirus, making interpretation difficult. CDC test positivity rates (a more established metric) are modestly elevated compared to last year.

Levels of rotavirus in wastewater compared to last year. Source: Wastewater Scan; Annotated by Your Local Epidemiologist.

Why the uptick? Vaccination rates have declined gradually (74% compared to 77% in 2018).

But, as David Higgins notes, hesitancy alone likely isn’t the driver. Rotavirus vaccination is uniquely vulnerable to access barriers: The first dose must be given before 15 weeks, and the full series must be completed by 8 months. A child who loses Medicaid coverage, can’t find a pediatrician, or misses a single visit simply ages out of eligibility.

Vaccination data is delayed. So the current rates reflect children who should have been vaccinated in 2021, at the height of the pandemic-era disruption in care. Watching how these trends evolve alongside new access challenges, like Medicaid cuts, will be critical.

Vitamin K refusal shows concerning trends, increasing 77% (from 2.1% to 5.2%) from 2017 to 2024. This shot prevents Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding (VKDB), a condition where newborns bleed spontaneously because they can’t yet produce enough clotting factors. The classical form affects as many as 1 in 60 to 1 in 250 unprotected infants. In other words, even a small increase in refusal translates directly into preventable harm.

What this means for you: If your child receives standard care (the routine childhood vaccination schedule and no refusal of the Vitamin K shot), they are very well protected. On a population level, we have a real problem. This will take all of us listening to questions, concerns, and confusion, answering questions from a place of empathy, and creating systems that make it easier (and more affordable) for people to access care.


Spotlight: Alpha-gal syndrome

We’ve gotten a lot of questions about alpha-gal syndrome from ticks lately, including a lovely snailmail note from a reader asking us to cover it.

What is it? A meat allergy triggered by a Lone Star tick bite. The tick introduces a sugar molecule called alpha-gal into your bloodstream. Your immune system responds. The next time you eat red meat, your body reacts.

Who is at most risk? The Lone Star tick is most common in the Southeast and South-Central U.S., but its range is expanding. For example, last year, there was an explosion of cases in the Northeast (Martha’s Vineyard).

Is alpha-gal actually increasing, or does it just feel that way? Both. Awareness has grown enormously in the last few years, which means more doctors are testing for it, and more cases are being caught that would previously have been written off as mystery GI issues or unexplained allergies. But the underlying cases are also genuinely rising. The lone star tick’s range is expanding northward and westward, driven largely by climate and deer population changes. CDC estimates there are around 450,000 cases in the U.S., but that’s almost certainly an undercount.

How would I know if I have it? The reaction is delayed two to six hours after eating, so by the time hives, stomach cramps, or nausea appear, most people don’t connect it to the meal. It can progress to anaphylaxis. People spend months thinking they have IBS or a sensitive stomach. If you have unexplained allergic reactions, especially delayed ones after meals, ask your care team about the possibility of an allergy.

Is it just red meat? Mostly. Beef, pork, lamb, and venison are the main triggers. Some people also react to dairy, gelatin, or mammalian-derived medications. Sensitivity varies a lot, which is part of why it’s so hard to diagnose.

Will I have this forever? Not necessarily. Some people regain tolerance if they avoid further tick bites, which is what prevents the immune system from re-sensitizing. Others don’t recover. No treatment exists beyond avoidance.

How do I avoid getting it? Take precautions against tick bites.


Good news

  1. The South Carolina measles outbreak—the largest in the U.S. in 35 years—has officially ended, marking a significant milestone in containment.

  2. Suicide prevention is working. A new study found that roughly 4,300 fewer teens and young adults died by suicide in the years following the launch of the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline. Tell people about this resource.

Source: JAMA
  1. A pancreatic cancer trial is showing real progress. Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers because it’s caught late and responds poorly to treatment. Follow-up results from a very small phase 1 clinical trial testing a vaccine to treat pancreatic cancer showed that nearly 90% of people whose immune systems responded to the vaccine were still alive up to six years after receiving the last treatment. (Typically, the five-year survival rate is ~13%.)

  2. Good news on dengue vaccines. A dengue vaccine trial kept every vaccinated participant out of the hospital over five years and reduced symptomatic infections by 65%. Dengue infects an estimated 100–400 million people annually worldwide.


Question grab bag

What is your take on the Pentagon recently ending its flu immunization requirement for active-duty military?

Here’s the deal: scientifically and economically, this new policy just doesn’t add up. I did some back-of-the-napkin math,1 and the military immunization requirement saves 30,000–98,000 duty days a year from the flu, which amounts to about $10-40 million in taxpayer dollars. This policy has been in place since the 1950s precisely because military readiness depends on keeping troops healthy and in the field.

But values and politics shape a huge portion of health policy. That’s what happened here. The performative political statement against vaccines as well as the intersection of individualism coming to the fore against the collective good.

If you have questions or requests, comment or email us at hello@yle.health. We read everything! And love to hear from you.


Bottom line

The weather is changing, trust is changing, and both are reshaping the diseases we face and how we protect ourselves. In the background, public health and research continue to fight to bring you good news.

Love, YLE


Your Local Epidemiologist (YLE) is founded and operated by Dr. Katelyn Jetelina, MPH PhD—an epidemiologist, wife, and mom of two little girls. YLE reaches over 425,000 people in over 132 countries with one goal: “Translate” ever-evolving public health science so that people are well-equipped to make evidence-based decisions. This newsletter is free to everyone, thanks to the generous support of fellow YLE community members.