The other day, when I saw the photograph of Big Ben with the anti-Israel slogan "from the river to the sea" projected upon it, I thought I was having a bad dream. It barely made the news here. If anything, it should have read "We Support Israel." Where next, the Eiffel Tower? The Statue of Liberty?
It's been only 4 months since the massacre in Israel. Yet entire countries have already capitulated to Hamas and have tolerated and abetted the atrocities and the Jew-hatred with amazing speed. Biden, after a brief initial show of support for Israel, has since then made constant demands on Netanyahu to have "pauses" in the4 fighting; to have ceasefires; to try not to kill "Palestinians"; and just reversed the Trump administration's Pompeo Doctrine, ”which stated that civilian Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria were not necessarily illegal according to international law." He has also called Netanyahu unprintable names. Biden, however, has never made any demands of Hamas, because he doesn't want to alienate his Muslim voters in the United States.
Meanwhile, the anti-Israel rallies go on. And so did the Big Ben slogan, as Melanie Phillips notes in her 2/25/24 column:
A watershed moment. In a supine Britain, Islamists are seizing their opportunity
"Last Wednesday evening saw a watershed moment in Britain.
"Parliamentary
rules were torn up and democratic debate scrapped under the pressure of
threats to murder British members of parliament in connection with a
foreign war, as I commented here.
"While
the mob in Parliament Square waved a phalanx of Palestinian flags and
bayed abuse of Israel, the words “from river to sea” were projected onto
parliament’s Elizabeth Tower, or “Big Ben”.
"The symbolism was
devastating and appalling. The slogan “From the river to the sea,
Palestine will be free” is the infamous cry, by those waging Islamic
holy war and their western supporters, for the destruction of Israel and
the Jews within it. Yet it was being projected onto the structure that
symbolises democracy and the nation. No less terrible than using
parliament to stage a call for the genocide of the Jews, this was also a
gloating statement that the Islamists were now in control of Britain.
"It
was subsequently reported that Ben Jamal, Director of the Palestine
Solidarity Campaign who organised Wednesday’s hate-fest outside the
Commons, told demonstrators to “ramp up the pressure” on MPs and to
demonstrate in such numbers “that they will have to lock the doors of
parliament itself”.
"On Saturday, the police closed Tower Bridge for an hour as the “ceasefire now” mob blocked traffic and let off flares.
"And
the police stood back and let this happen — even though they have legal
powers to prevent such “disruption to the life of the community”, just
as they have powers to prevent demonstrators from screaming “death to
the Jews” or “globalise the intifada” as they have done every week since
the October 7 Hamas pogrom in Israel.
"Criticised for standing by while “from river to sea” was projected onto parliament, the police responded:
This is a chant that has been frequently heard at pro-Palestinian
demonstrations or many years and we are aware of the strength of feeling
in relation to it. While there are scenarios where chanting or using
these words could be unlawful depending on the specific location for
context, its use in a wider public protest setting such as [Wednesday]
might is not a criminal offence.
"How exactly does a genocidal slogan become lawful just because it is
used in a “wider public protest setting”? This response was as asinine
as the previous statement by the Metropolitan Police that the call for
“jihad” heard at these demonstrations could bear a number of different
meanings — regardless of the fact that in this particular “scenario” it
has only one meaning: holy war.
"At best, these police responses
are the product of their “diversity training” — as a result of which
they “took the knee” to Black Lives Matter and danced with the
nihilistic social disruptors of Extinction Rebellion.
"At worst it may be because, as the Jewish Chronicle reported last
week, they have been trained by Islamists in how to deal with
“Islamophobia”, the pseudo-psychiatric neologism which has nothing to do
with actual prejudice against Muslims — which should be condemned like
any other prejudice — but was invented specifically to suppress
legitimate discussion and criticism of the Islamic world.
"An
impulse that has been on display once again over the past few days. The
former Conservative party chairman, Lee Anderson MP, had the
Conservative whip withdrawn over his comment that Sadiq Khan, the Muslim
Mayor of London, was under the control of Islamists and had “given our
capital away to his mates”.
"Anderson undoubtedly went too
far in accusing Khan of being an Islamist stooge. Nevertheless, there
are legitimate questions to be asked of Khan’s behaviour in his role
overseeing the Metropolitan Police. The Mayor’s website says his
responsibilities involve setting the Met’s priorities and “holding them
to account for delivering a professional, efficient and effective
service to Londoners”. Yet under Khan’s oversight, the Met have failed
week after week to implement public order laws on the streets of London
and have instead facilitated gross anti-Israel and anti-Jewish
incitement.
"The Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, and the Home
Secretary, James Cleverly, are doing little more than flapping their
hands and passing yet more public order laws for the police to ignore.
Sunak said on Friday that some of the scenes witnessed in recent months,
particularly the antisemitic behaviour, were “appalling and
unacceptable”.
"Feeble or what? If he really wanted to
counter the rampant antisemitism that is currently taking Britain into
the sewer, he should be declaring that the campaign of demonisation
against Israel is based on vicious lies and genocide denial; that the
Palestinian cause is the principal conduit for
Jew-hatred in Britain; and that he is taking immediate action against
the Hamas operatives and other Islamists and fellow-travellers who are
behind these “appalling and unacceptable” mob hate-fests.
"He won’t say any of that. By contrast, the former Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, does understand what’s at stake. In an article for the Telegraph at the weekend, Braverman wrote:
They started with the Jews; there were stern words of
disapproval from the top but things only got worse. The Islamist cranks
and left-wing extremists then took control of the streets; the police
looked meekly on…
The truth is that the Islamists, the extremists and the antisemites are in charge now. They have bullied the Labour Party, they have bullied our institutions, and now they have bullied our country into submission.
But
what is our response? Our leaders bury their heads in the sand,
preferring the illusion of a “successful multicultural society”,
terrified of being called “racist”. But the law has not changed, mass
extremism parades itself proudly, campuses remain dangerous places for
Jews, and Labour is still rotten to the core…
We cannot allow
teachers to be hounded out of schools because a picture of Muhammad was
shown, or children to be censured because a Koran was scuffed
accidentally. In this country, it is perfectly lawful to criticise any
religion or God. One may disagree passionately, but it is not criminal.
None
of this is easy. I’ve written about how the protests could be policed
better. Others have set out how we can clean up campuses, mosques and
councils and, more fundamentally, how we can promote better integration.
I may have been sacked because I spoke out against the appeasement of Islamists,
but I would do it again because we need to wake up to what we are
sleep-walking into: a ghettoised society where free expression and
British values are diluted. Where sharia law, the Islamist mob and
antisemites take over communities. We need to overcome the fear of being
labelled Islamophobic and speak truthfully. Enough of the hand-wringing
and apologies. Turning a blind eye to fanatics has got us into this
terrible situation: it needs to stop.
This is a crisis. And
the fightback must start now, with urgency, if we are to preserve the
liberties we cherish and the privileges this country affords us all. If
we are to have any chance of saving our country from the mob.
"In response to this, Braverman has been accused of being racist and
Islamophobic. But of course. The frightening truth of her message was
projected onto the cradle of democracy last Wednesday night."
------------
Suella Braverman has a perfectly-fitting last name. What she said could apply to the U.S. as well. She has always spoken the truth, and so has Melanie Phillips, whose columns are an antidote to the antisemitic poison.