Cumulative Confirmed COVID-19 Cases

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Melanie Phillips on Iran

I came across Melanie Phillip's recent column at the Power Line blog:

----------------------------- 

Wake up West, Iran is a threat to us all; Israel was told that Tehran’s nuclear potential was at a critical point and had no choice but to attack 

Melanie Phillips, Monday June 16 2025, 8.48pm BST, The Times

"At four o’clock yesterday morning, after my phone shrieked an ear-piercing warning of an imminent missile attack from Iran, I stumbled down to our underground shelter here in Jerusalem as the air-raid siren began to wail. With other residents of our apartment complex enduring another disturbed night under the nerve-shattering stream of alerts and sirens, I wondered if the ominous booms and thuds meant missiles were being shot down by Iron Dome or were direct hits. As the sun rose we had the answer: the attack had left at least eight Israelis dead and hundreds injured.

"These Iranian ballistic missiles are far more powerful than the rockets fired at Israel for decades from Gaza, Lebanon and most recently Yemen. And so many are being fired at once that some are getting through Israel’s fabled air defences. So the toll of civilian deaths and injuries is rising.

"Even as these casualties mount, however, there is huge relief that the nightmare under which everyone here has been living for so long, of a nuclear-armed Iran determined to wipe Israel from the map, is finally being tackled. No one here doubts for a moment that Israel will win this war, even though it may be protracted and the price may be very steep. Israel hasn’t started a war with Iran: it has started the end of Iran’s war against Israel and the West because the Jewish state believes it has no choice.

"Many have never understood that the past 20 months of events in Gaza, since the atrocities of October 7, 2023, are part of a multi-front war of extermination waged against Israel by Iran through its proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and the West Bank.

"Israelis believe they must totally defeat Hamas as a military force to prevent it from repeating October 7-style atrocities. But they are also agonised over the fate of the hostages, whom Hamas won’t release unless Israel surrenders and whose continued incarceration has gravely hampered IDF operations.

"With Iran, by contrast, the issue is straightforward. Emerging from the rubble of their apartments after the missile strikes, already traumatised Israelis say: “We have no choice but to continue with this war if we are not to be annihilated by a nuclear Iran.”

"Israel attacked Iran because it believed the point of no return had been reached. The International Atomic Energy Agency said last week that Iran had enough enriched uranium to make nine nuclear bombs and was in breach of its non-proliferation obligations.

"After Israel decapitated Hezbollah last year, and with Hamas in Gaza now severely degraded, Iran was staring at the destruction of its “ring of fire” proxy war strategy to exterminate Israel. Nuclear weapons were its last, most devastating resort. So it sped up its attempt to build them.

"Very recently, Israeli intelligence learnt that Tehran had been secretly working on weaponising nuclear material into an explosive device, bringing it weeks away from being able to produce a bomb. It also aimed to build 300 ballistic missiles a month. Both of these posed an immediate existential threat that Israel had to counter. The reason for this crisis was that the West, led by previous US and UK administrations, failed to acknowledge the irreconcilable religious fanaticism of the Tehran regime and believed it was amenable to compromise. The resulting US-brokered 2015 agreement could have enabled Iran to get the bomb with only a few years’ delay.

"At the weekend Lord Hammond, the former Conservative foreign secretary who helped negotiate that agreement, said that “the Israelis are standing in the way of a new deal” with Iran. Was Hammond seriously suggesting that destroying Iran’s capacity to produce nuclear weapons was “standing in the way” of another deal with people who never even granted access to verify they were fulfilling their promises?

"This was on a par in its fatuousness with Sir Keir Starmer’s prim call for “de-escalation” between Israel and Iran. “De-escalating” the attempt to stop the Iranian bomb means allowing Iran to get the bomb. Both the Hammond and Starmer statements are based on the imbecilic western belief that religious fanatics negotiate in good faith and are governed by rational self-interest.

"Many in Israel — as in America — have written Britain off as having hopelessly lost the plot under the double whammy of radical, anti-western Islamists and left-wing, anti-western and post-truth ideologies. Israelis perceive to their stupefaction that Israel, the victim of genocidal attack and having gone to greater lengths than any other military to minimise civilian casualties in war, has been demonised in Britain as the aggressor and wanton killer of children. Israel is targeting Iran’s nuclear and military infrastructure while Iran is targeting Israeli civilians — a war crime. Yet the usual suspects are accusing Israel of aggression and engaging in “tit for tat” attacks.

"If Israel now smashes the Iran-based Shia axis, this will reshape the Middle East for the better and remove an unconscionable threat not just to Israel but to the West too. “When you chant ‘Death to America!’ it is not just a slogan — it is a policy,” said Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in 2023. In Britain, the security service has warned of an “extraordinary threat” of Iranian terrorist attacks.

"Israel is doing the West a huge service — for which the Jewish state is paying in blood — that much of the West still obdurately refuses to realise."

No comments: